Realistic Endodontic Therapy: Perception vs Reality 

Endodontic Therapy, at its root, is a very predictable practice and science provided that tried and tested techniques are used. For one, knowledge of endodontic therapy outcome is important. Second, communication between the general referring dentist and the endodontist is crucial; the endodontist should take into account the observations and notes of the referring dentist for each individual case. With this knowledge, the dentist can then aid the patient in deciding the best course of action to take, whether it be retaining their natural dentition or having the affected tooth replaced by an implant. However, studies assessing treatment and their outcomes tend to vary considerably in their results, which often cause confusion and make it hard for dentists to decide on the best course of action. This presentation aims to highlight evidence-based assessment of endodontic therapy to avoid this confusion that may arise during an endodontist’s work. At the end of the presentation, participants should be able to: 

• Discern the different kinds of variations that exist in endodontic therapy outcome literature.
  • Make the best possible decision when to comes to deciding between root canal treatment and implant treatment by applying a management strategy.
  • Be aware of the different clinical factors that have a hand in influencing the prognosis of non-surgical endodontic treatment.
  • Be aware of the limitations of general dental practitioners when it comes to endodontic therapy.